The diagrams below show how an office building looks at present and the plan for its future development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the present office building and the proposed changes for the future.
overall, it is clear from the maps that several changes will done in near future. The major change being in grass areas and as well as in kitchen and canteen areas.
At present, the lots of area are covered by the grass in west side and also in east side. The entrance are situated in south east corner of the map. In addition, the reception is located in front of the entrance. However, a lots of office cabins build in the west side of the reception. Some other rooms like kitchen, canteen and stock room constructed in north side of the map.
In future, many proposed changes will being construct like at place of west side grass they build outdoor activity area soon. As well as the place of east side grass they build meeting area and also put coffee machine too. Furthermore, the offices will build in the place of kitchen and canteen. Moreover , the entrance will shift to the center of south side of the map.
- Small enterprises are being Phased out and replaced by big multinational Corporations Do the benefits of this outweigh the drawbacks 56
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The diagrams below show how an office building looks at present and the plan for its future development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...the proposed changes for the future. overall, it is clear from the maps that several...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'do' or 'be done'?
Suggestion: do; be done
...from the maps that several changes will done in near future. The major change being ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ated in front of the entrance. However, a lots of office cabins build in the west side...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...onstructed in north side of the map. In future, many proposed changes will being const...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e place of kitchen and canteen. Moreover , the entrance will shift to the center o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57923497268 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15686248185 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497267759563 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.0432456481 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.8333333333 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806185365829 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372820359314 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460066958805 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659560347848 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534240416119 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.