The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Write at least 150 words.
The consequences of clear cutting of forests are delineated in the flow chart. There are total four effects those are caused by the deforestation.
Due to the heavy logging equipments that are used to compress the soil, the soil becomes hard and baked. Owing to this, the rain water is not absorbed in the soil thus, may consequently lead to the flooding of rivers. Moreover, the top soil layer is eroded because, holding of the roots of plants is less. Hence, this may degrade the vegetation as, it opens the door for pioneer species to let in. However, this degradation hinders the biodiversity.
On the other hand, the deliberate or accidental burning risk destroys the waste wood from logging. Therefore, this waste that is consumed by a certain amount of micro-organisms are lost. Moreover, plants are the primary source for the moisture that is present in the air. The courtesy of cutting the plants, has escalated drought in a number of areas as the level of precipitation is decreased. All these factors degrades the vegetation and hence, biodiversity is decreased.
Overall, the environmental problems such as flooding, erosion, less biodiversity and the surging level of drought are caused due to deforestation.
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- Keeping in view the importance of fitness companies should provide time to employees to participate in sports during the day What is your opinion on this matter 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 11
- The pie charts below give information about the household expenditure of an average US family in different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12437810945 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95249216257 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4919097241 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.2307692308 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0390684047178 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0159666884044 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454965037024 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.033134386707 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490623340142 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.