line graph
The line graph compares four countries in terms of their oil usage over the period of 21 years.
It is clear that the amount of oil consumption in both China and Middle East increase steadily in the whole time. Moreover, The US oil consumption is predicted to fall quickly in the last 15 years.
By 2009, The US was by far the most usage barrels of oil in the world, just under 10 millions barrels a day. By contrast, both China and Middle East had nearly lowest same number barrels of oil used for a day, to nearly 2 millions, and the figures for Western Europe and Japan stood under 4 Millions. Over following 6 years the average oil consumption remained relatively stable in both of the America and Middle East.
Between the year 2015 to 2030, the US and Western Europe and Japan have started cut down their oil consumption, most noticeable in the us where oil consumption to fall by 6 millions barrels of oil in 2030. However, the amount oil use in China rise slightly throughout the time, by approximately 1 millions. There have not changed can be seen the China, by roughly 3millions and 4 millions barrels of oil.
- the first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 73
- the first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 73
- line graph 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'nearly the lowest'.
Suggestion: nearly the lowest
...ontrast, both China and Middle East had nearly lowest same number barrels of oil used for a d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Between the year 2015 to 2030, the US and Western Europe and Japan have starte...
^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il use in China rise slightly throughout the time, by approximately 1 millions. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54679802956 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49407071873 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3873601507 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.05238107387 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322578885956 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912390870908 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725802493401 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125712679483 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.