Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is considered that nations are resembling each other with time as similar kinds of products are available everywhere, which people are choosing to buy. In my opinion, although presence of every products everywhere increases the options, it also diminishes the variations in culture, which has far reaching negative impact in the world.
With respect to primitive days, civilization has developed tremendously now along with globalization. This makes the product of one country available at another end of the world because the logistic facilities has been embolden overtime. At the same time, people's choices are influenced through social media and advertising, as they are seeing products in a glorified way and inclined towards buying the same things. Even though, it flourishes the trade and economy of country which exports if affect negatively for the country that imports products. For example, the easy availability and designed products of countries like the UK and the USA are infiltrating the market of developing countries, this tarnishes the local market and economy.
Moreover, the countries tendency to buy similar product result in the loss of culture and heritage that are unique to each country. For instance, the influence of western comfortable dresses have captured markets all over the world. Countries of Southeast Asia like India, Japan, Thailand, Bhutan etc. are adapting those clothings leaving their own traditional dresses, which slowly kills the long held tradition that were unique to those countries. These activities affect the tourism industry as well, because one of the reasons people like to travel is to see the different and unique cultures around the world.
To conclude, It can be said, easy accessibility both physical and virtual products was thought to be resulting in a collaborative world benefitting all, whereas, only few can take advantage of collaboration. Diminishing variety will end the cultural side of the world resulting in the overall sustainability of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Tabassum Zaman | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | Delara | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sameersomaya | 87 | view |
- It is through the use of logic and precise careful measurement that we become aware of our progress Without such tools we have no reference points to indicate how far we have advanced or retreated 83
- The following is the memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past night our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to whether and local news During this time period most of the compl 58
- Too much time money and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology Society should instead focus in maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens 83
- The function of art is not to keep pace with science and technology but rather to provide an escape from these forces 58
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'emboldened'.
Suggestion: emboldened
...ecause the logistic facilities has been embolden overtime. At the same time, peoples cho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...l market and economy. Moreover, the countries tendency to buy similar product result ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44761904762 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88739539277 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0303986896 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237668808324 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765948553271 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420037096271 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133834402685 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484056481334 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.