The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two provided line graphs represent the stats on how much money was spent on children's sports by their parents and the numbers of participants in three kinds of sports in Britain respectively, from the year 2008 to 2014.
It is conspicuous from both line graphs that children and parents of Britain are influenced by sports activities over the given period of 6 years. As both expenditures did by parents and participation by children have shown an upward trend.
The interest of British parents in spending money on their children's sports had shown a gradual increment over the years. In 2008, expenditure on sports activities was only about 20 pounds/month. For the next three progressive years, the increment of about 4-5 pounds is evident. This leads to an increase in expenditure up to 24, 28, and 33 pounds for the years 2010, 2012, and 2014 respectively.
Out of three categories of activities, participation in athletics had shown a considerable increase in numbers over time, whereas, the other two showed a gradual but small increase. The number of participants in football and swimming started from 8 and 2 million in 2008 and increased to just 8.5 and 3 million respectively. Participation in athletics remained steady in the starting as well as in the ending, but, from the year 2010 to 2012 it had shown a dramatic increase, multiplying almost five times, from 1 million in 2008 to around 5 million in 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 92
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding, but, from the year 2010 to 2012 it had shown a dramatic increase, multiplyi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96265560166 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97232750668 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5168197859 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322914620514 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135794987056 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955666717576 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21621536759 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079769678098 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.