Recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by around fifty percent over the last fifty years. What can we do to help protect the wildlife around the world?
It is evident that approximately half of the wildlife species have been disappearing for the last five decades. Human has become the prime culprit of this destruction. This essay suggests that limiting masses activities and adopting a sustainable development approach are two viable solutions to deal with this issue.
One of the possible ways to save wildlife around the world is to reduce the amount of pollution created due to personal activities. That is to say, individuals perform various activities causing air, water, and soil pollution which
ultimately leads to severe environmental conditions, as a result, wild species suffer from this unfavorable environment, thus controlling these tasks can reduce the problem to a certain extent. A new act passed in Japan that encourage people to limit the use of vehicle has significantly reduced the number of gases into the atmosphere.
On another side, sustainability is another contributing factor to alleviate this issue. In other words, people should be motivated to use renewable energy resources to fulfill their energy needs rather than using conventional one which can help to grow the wildlife without any mortal intervention, and species that are on the verge of extinction can be saved. A recent figure shows that adopting an alternative way of fuel has deteriorated about 65% of the difficulty of endangering the population.
On balance, the rate of affecting flora and fauna is escalating for the past few years due to personal interference. This essay argues that encouraging individuals to minimize their processes and using less harmful sources of fuel can solve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-23 | JJsidhu | 78 | view |
| 2016-09-29 | bhumikasuryavanshi | 87 | view |
- Recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by around fifty percent over the last fifty years What can we do to help protect the wildlife around the world 78
- Some people believe that cooking at home is a waste of time They feel it is better to buy fast food which is more convenient and less stressful in modern life Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 67
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically What are the effects on the environment and the kinds of jobs 67
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
- More working people are busy with work and have no enough time to spend with their family and friends Why does this happen What are the effects on family life and society 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, as a result, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01519573584 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.771150015 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.818181818 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125635700075 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423490479031 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544653387922 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613604406221 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431040521629 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.