The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school.
To what extent do you agree with this statement and why?
There is a school of thought that believes that families outperform classes in the field of education. From my point of view, while this argument is right to some extents, I am completely against it.
Firstly, it is formal qualifications earned at school that are often the entry points to stable vocations. For example, if you want to work as a lawyer or doctor, you will at least have a requirement to complete a professional certificate which you can’t get at home. It holds the meaning of evidence to demonstrate and ensure your aptitude. Without such qualifications, an individual could become limited in what they can do for institutions and the public. Subsequently, job-seekers might lose their career opportunity with a high remuneration as well as a good workplace environment.
Secondly, school also prepares you for relationships outside your family, which is an indispensable aspect of life. Not only could courses teach academic knowledge to learners but also become a good socialization tool because each student needs to deal with associations on numerous different levers. Admittedly, families have distributed a necessary role for students to gain their moral outlook and aspirational goals from their parents. Nonetheless, children can succeed without a favorable family setting to a certain extent. It is doubtful whether they could do with non-schooling.
In conclusion, although there are a significant number of avenues of family’s education, I believe that learning in school is more important than that in family, as it lays the foundations for future attainment and wider success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-22 | faztaz | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-01 | Mamun_291120 | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | thtam182 | 66 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | princess of dad | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | duong0403 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...dent needs to deal with associations on numerous different levers. Admittedly, families have distr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37795275591 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19461929049 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4573081463 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237818556352 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666313811042 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408612878706 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125097540066 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232564659196 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.