The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram illustrates the changes in student block between 2010 and present.
Overall, the entire building has been reconstructed with a few more facilities.
In the surrounding area, two trees in the front have been replaced by parking lot, while the entrance in the right corner and the garden behind the block still remained throughout the years.
For the inner space, an ensuite bathroom has been added in the big hall and the kitchen to the left has also been widened. In the north-east of the region, another study-bedroom had been built and the living room at the end is now a new study-bedroom. Although there are many changes, the bathroom in the middle and the hall right behind the parking have not been removed. About the study bedrooms next to the ensuite bathroom, or in the upper-right corner or even in the left side of the construction, they have not been changed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- Writing Task 2 Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 74
- The chart shows the amount of time children spend with their parents depending on age groups 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84967320261 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63963293098 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0653036504 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0373909055516 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229860321477 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323581156808 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0364496667897 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358278444605 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.