In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing.
Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages ?
It is a prevailing reality that people are expected to live longer on a worldwide scale. This essay will cover its negative and positive sides, then elucidate why from my perspective, the bright aspect of this fact outweigh the opposite one.
On the one hand, further extended longevity obviously not only benefits the old, but the young as well. As the lifespan of human is stretched, more people live into old age, which gives them more time and opportunities to put the final mark on their before-death list. By this way, they will pass away in jubilation and without regret. What is more, aged people might pass down to the posterity indispensable-to-succeed understandings. The immense collection of life philosophy and quotes alerting about scams and revealing potential chances inherited word by word from our forefathers is a prime example. Being able to fulfil the desires of a life time and passively contribute to the success of the after generation solidify how advantageous lengthened lives are.
On the other hand, there are also adverse ramifications in terms of their health and financial burdens on the close ones. The aging in this regard has a high chance to result in more people suffering from acutely chronic diseases including Alzheimer, the blurry vision,... given that the immune system deteriorates by the time. Time also bring in physical and mental weariness, making them unable to labor at old age whilst the expenditure for the whole family remains unchanged.
To conclude, I’m convinced that the disadvantages of living longer is outweighed by the advantages since the medical ameliorations now enable old people to be on the mend in an instant and more nursing homes, as well as welfare from the authority might ease strain on the shoulders of other family members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentages of UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think this will change in the future Is it good for us to rely too much on computer 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
.... Being able to fulfil the desires of a life time and passively contribute to the success...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s including Alzheimer, the blurry vision,... given that the immune system deterior...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14527027027 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98880726447 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641891891892 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1665616052 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065360359833 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239197036544 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386706755937 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587433259526 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467965712964 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.