In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing.
Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages ?
It is a prevailing reality that people are expected to live longer on a worldwide scale. This essay will cover its negative and positive sides, then provide a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, further extended lives not only benefit the workforce, but the education of young people as well. As more people live into old age, the death rate decreases, which equals an increase in the force of labors. Despite their ages, advancement in health care may minimize the impacts of the aging process and enable the after-60-year-old to contribute more. What is more, aged people might pass down to the posterity indispensable-to-succeed understandings. The immense collection of life philosophy and quotes alerting about scams and revealing potential chances inherited word by word from our forefathers is a prime example. The expansion of human resources and contribution to the success of the after generation solidify how advantageous lengthened lives are.
On the other hand, there are also adverse ramifications in terms of their health and burdens on the close ones. The aging in this regard has a high chance to result in more people suffering from acutely chronic diseases including Alzheimer, the blurry vision, …given that the immune system deteriorates by the time. Time also bring in physical and mental weariness, making some of them unable to labor at old age whilst the expenditure for the whole family remains unchanged. Therefore, their children have to work more laboriously to provide for and spend more time taking care of them. Nonetheless, the medical ameliorations now enable old people to be on the mend in an instant as previously stated and more nursing homes, as well as welfare from the authority might ease strain on the shoulders of other family members.
To conclude, I’m convinced that the disadvantages of living longer is outweighed by the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and the disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 11
- The bar chart shows the percentages of UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releant 78
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages then give your opinion 11
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, well, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22950819672 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03986590745 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629508196721 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9313643018 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0543894628179 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219401713599 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362146038824 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527684987709 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479213051417 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.