Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are opinions that oral communication outweighs written communication in transmitting information. In my opinion, circumstances are vital to decide the importance of each creation
To begin with, good orators must incorporate factors such as intonations, facial expressions, gestures into their speeches. Thanks to those elements, audiences experience a variety of emotions to such as determination, passion of the speakers which in turn increase the conviction and impact of the message on the listeners’ minds. The presidential election is the best situation to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method. During their campaigns, candidates will make many trips and deliver their speeches live in swing states to increase their chance of winning. With articulate delivery of their intentions and benefits to the country and citizens, the candidates are likely to gain more support and become the president.
However, in some cases, the application of text is preferable. Usually, writers usually have a longer preparation time, which allows them to do more research and proofread. These practices, hence, make the transmission of knowledge clearer and mitigate any misunderstandings. As a result, professionals like scientists would prefer this method more, considering the enormous amount of information in their publications. Moreover, written communication can solve a deathly shortcoming of spoken one. Either being written down or typed in apps like google docs, words require a few efforts to be altered completely without any trail. Therefore, the information can retain its meaning over a long period of time, enabling generations of readers to broaden their horizons.
In conclusion, I believe both means of communication hold equal status in conveying the message of the author. It largely depends on the users to apply them effectively and achieve the expected results in their work and life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- For many people the reason they work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- TOPIC The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tion can retain its meaning over a long period of time, enabling generations of readers to bro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66089965398 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22436397296 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664359861592 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2273538777 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138567859481 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489393913436 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790276454429 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909824796074 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598685407355 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.