The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia, Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates how much total wheat was produced in Asia, Europe and the rest of the world from 1840 to 2000.
As we could see graph, Asia and Europe produced a significantly declined wheat while the rest of the world created the growth wheat production. Additionally, the difference between the percentage of production in the given regions became smaller over the time period.
In 1980, over 50% percent of the wheat production was produced was approximately 10% higher than the figure for Europe and five times as much as the rest of the world. However, there was a dramatic decline to 30% was 15% lower than the production of wheat in Europe after 40 years. The figure for Asia fell dramatically to 20%, while the percentage of word production in Europe and the rest of the world stood at 50% and 30%, respectively in 1920.
In 1960, the percentage of word production in Asia is likely to grow again, increased to 25%, whereas wheat production in Europe had dropped by around 10%. By the year 2000, Asia's share of production continued to rise to 40%, in contrast to the figure for Europe and the rest of the world plummet to 25% and 32%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-04 | Bon123 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | Patel Romaa | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | Patel Romaa | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | gur1040894 | 75 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | hamza_98 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 67
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- Nowadays many animal species are becoming extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem others believe that human beings are more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, there was a dramatic decline to 30% was 15% lower than the production of whe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70873786408 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64284613375 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4530737891 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382094466199 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183719527029 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850614808166 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26306132841 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658864349988 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.