Question :Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
People have differing views with regard to the idea that giving a grade to the members of the students group in the universities and high schools. While some argue that students in a group must receive a different grade, I believe that all members of the group should receive the same grade.
The first reason is that receiving the same grade for all members of projects' groups in the high schools or universities leads all members of those groups to work hard and doing one's best. Nowadays, studying in universities and high schools is as demanding and challenging as other professional jobs because parents and teachers want the students to be on top of attending calls every day. Also, many teachers would assign some projects to students to do in groups to become more successful and develop their real skills and abilities. While students are doing teamwork' projects, they could apply themselves to work hard, which I think will result in more motivation for students and inspire them to develop their talent through application and perseverance. When all group members eagerly try to solve and do the project in the best approach, at the same time, they are trying to reach their potential and get a high grade.
Another subtle point is that giving the same mark on the projects for students has some positive consequences. From the group perspective, when a group receives a good grade in one project, all members of that group get the same reward and be encouraged on the stage altogether. From a personal perspective, giving the same grade means that teachers consider the equal right and opportunities for all members of the group identically. Therefore, this leads students to be more motivated, and they know that if they work hard, they could reach their desire position. And those who do not try would lose their chance to get a good grade.
In conclusion, I strongly support the idea that all group members should receive the same grade for their project because it is more beneficial for them.
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- The cave paintings of Lascaux in southwestern France date to around 15 000 B C E and are among the finest examples of prehistoric art known Ever since the paintings were discovered scholars have puzzled over their purpose According to one widely discussed 89
- Actually many archaeologists believe that the coin discussed in the reading is not a fake They believe it represents genuine evidence that the Norse came into contact with Native Americans a thousand years ago First the great distance of the Maine site fr 75
- Agree disagree Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a coutry 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... of those groups to work hard and doing ones best. Nowadays, studying in universitie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89212827988 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58241243102 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454810495627 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.3806582268 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.076923077 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558852910835 0.236089414692 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23659184425 0.076458572812 309% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146674853729 0.0737576698707 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.391758658454 0.150856017488 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065847963969 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.