An American film actor once said, “Tomorrow is important and precious”. Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present. Do you agree or disagree?
The past, present, and future are concepts which contain philosophical meaning. Some people believe that the future is so ebullient and precious that individuals and society should pay more attention to it; others think that it is better to live for the present. As for me, I lean on the idea that people should focus on their present rather than their future due to some rational reasons.
To begin with, living in the present allows people to possess healthy minds and bodies. If people are always worried about the future, they are likely to fail to grasp tiny pieces of the current happy lives and abandon their life's purposes. As a result, people may have to deal with overthinking situations and serious stress. On the other hand, people who live in the present moment are more inclined to live a satisfied and discerning life. Now that they look straight forward to their current lives, they are able to captivate every moment that brightens themselves, sometimes even helps them to overcome a despondent situation in the future. Further and even more importantly, though, self-loving people who focus on their current lifetime seem to have a healthier body. For example, Japanese people, who are reputed for their long lasting longevity, have a habit of meditating every morning that buttresses their flexible bodies. During the dawn, they find a tranquil and quiet place to think about how their lives are going; the purpose of this action is to keep in touch with their life’s goal.
Secondly, people can only have a precious future if only they pay more attention to their present, which is called “preparation”. Normally, people tend to feel so curious about their future that some kind of diverted fortune-telling is created with the purpose of satisfying their curiosity. However, these people seemingly spend their time dreaming of the future without any specific actions for their aspirations. Therefore, it is essential to keep up with the reality so that people can prepare for the future, instead of wasting time virtually chasing for it. To illustrate, I used to imagine that I would enter the only gifted high school in my city; nevertheless, there was no plan to act out my desire compounding my ability overestimation. Consequently, I was snapped out of expectation when I failed to get a slot at that elite school, facing a multitude of scorns from other people.
By way of conclusion, by giving people opportunities to be more cumulative and earn healthy minds and bodies, the present plays a vital role in building an auspicious future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-06 | huyp690 | 66 | view |
2021-09-06 | Naomi_manager | 83 | view |
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree 76
- Technology provides us with a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnic 81
- Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 76
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 86
- A university plans to develop a new research center in your country Some people want a center for business research Other people want a center for research in agriculture farming Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your count 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, kind of, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72082995696 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543123543124 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3369289739 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194744696772 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738638292074 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892644567283 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153276887941 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108028747671 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.