Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have differing views with regard to the learing skills.While some people argue that learning different skills are more important, I believe that individuals should focus on one skill rather than many skills.
The first reason is that it is more attracive for company owners to use people who have one skill.
Nowadays, job market is competitive, and those employees will be successful if the have deep knowledge in one specific area because they could derive their businesses' needs successfully. On the contrary, those who have several skills usually their knowledge is not significant because they do mundane tasks and could not be more effective than those who have deep knowledge in one skill. As a result, employes need well-qualified and competent workers.
Another subtle point is that people who focus on one skill can progress more quickly than those who have several skills. I think, people who have application and perseverance in their work, they are more likely could develop their talent more faster than others. At the same time, these people who applied themselves to work hard and gian real experience and learn a practical skill, lead to reach their potential and become more prosperous in their lives. Therefore, it is more likely to reach the better positions because they learn how they could try and use their potential. However, those people who have many skills, mostly, did not focus on one subject to learn deeper, and this could be a sign of weakness.
In conclusion, it is clear that people who have one skill are better prepared for the job market and could reach the better position.
- First it s true that growing and selling crops locally saves money on transportation costs but that will not necessarily make the new broccoli cheaper for consumers Yes the new breed of broccoli will be able to survive the hot summers on the east coast bu 80
- male professor The reading s arguments that the photographic negatives were created by Ansel Adams are not convincing It s true that the negatives have some similarities to Adams work but there are explanations for those similarities First the leaning pin 80
- You read about some concerns that have been raised about farming tuna However researchers are finding promising solutions to these problems First it s true that tuna farms need to be stocked with wild young but this may soon no longer be the case thanks t 80
- Agree disagree Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a coutry 76
- It s perfectly possible that the nests found inside the fossilized trees were made by bees 200 million years ago The arguments used by the skeptics are not convincing First it s true we have no fossil remains of actual bees that date to 200 million years 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...views with regard to the learing skills.While some people argue that learning differe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
... more likely could develop their talent more faster than others. At the same time, these pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 551, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...tions because they learn how they could try and use their potential. However, those peo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 52.1666666667 35% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50919844125 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7141518079 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360016919984 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165022861542 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100840457993 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238263916315 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675101768681 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.