The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two charts illustrate the amount of money stemming from the turnover of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas between 1999 and 2004 in five different European nations.
Overall, the UK was the country which earned the highest amount of money in both coffee and banana. From 1999 to 2004, the sale of coffee and bananas increased except for the figure of bananas in Sweden and Denmark.
Looking at the coffee’s sale, Sweden earned the lowest money at $0.8, followed by $1 in Belgium and $1.8 in Denmark. After five years, these datas rose around 2 or 3 million euros in each category. The sale of UK coffee started at 1.5 million before climbing to $20 in 2004, making the UK become the country which had the highest sales. Interestingly, Switzerland earned $6 in 2004, which was twice as much as in 1999.
Turning to banana’s sale, the UK was the leading country in both years with $15 in 1999 and $47 in 2000. In 1999, the sales in Switzerland and Belgium was around $1, which increased significantly to 5.5 million and 4 million respectively. In contrast, Sweden and Denmark witnessed a gradual decrease in the amount of sales, from $1.8 to $1 for the former and $2 to $0.9 for the latter
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- Modern trends in early education focus on an array of practical school projects rather than developing traditional skills through maths science and similar subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the lowest money at sh.8, followed by in Belgium and .8 in Denmark. After five...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sales. Interestingly, Switzerland earned in 2004, which was twice as much as in 1...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es in Switzerland and Belgium was around , which increased significantly to 5.5 mi...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease in the amount of sales, from .8 to for the former and to sh.9 for the latt...
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of sales, from .8 to for the former and to sh.9 for the latter
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75242718447 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68681563799 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0747114481 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305839067359 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129653236426 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921575075676 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218257117874 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744476279005 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.