The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the production of forest-based industry in the UK between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen from the graph that the production of paper and packaging experienced a significant increase during the 20-year period, while the opposite pattern was true for the production of sawn-wood and wood pulp. And also, the manufacture of paper and packaging had the greatest position among the three mentioned ones.
In the first ten years, the amount of paper and packaging produced slightly went up, from 230 to 250 million tonnes. Thereafter, the figure suddenly climbed to 350 million tonnes, which is almost one-and-a-half greater than the former number.
However, the story was different when it comes to the production of sawn-wood and wood pulp. Starting at 200 million tonnes in 1980, the amount of sawn-wood product saw a gradual decrease to 150 million tonnes by 1990 and continued to fall to only 130 in the next ten years. The pattern of wood pulp’ production is more complex. The figure fell from 175 to 150 million tonnes by 1980, whereas in the remaining period, it recovered and increased to 170 million tonnes.
- In many places prisons are overcrowded and expensive for governments to maintain Yet when offenders are released they end up back in prison a short while later Does prison work Should lawbreakers be rehabilitated or punished 71
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 82
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The process below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapple Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03645833333 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67206789427 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8356238966 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288604052567 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127401266164 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934594709331 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172333024073 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792204967244 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.