Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
t is appreciated that protecting wild animals is costly and time-consuming, and this effort could have been better made to do humankind good. From my perspective, I truly agree with this statement.
There are several drawbacks of allocating budgets to saving wild animals in terms of their potential threats to humans and waste of money. Initially, an overwhelming danger is that wild animals can carry diseases dangerous or fatal to humans. This is derived from the fact that wild species, such as tigers, are found to harbor parasites, such as intestinal worms and protozoa. Another dangerous factor is that wild animals can attack people by biting or scratching, resulting in unwanted injuries. Besides, in order to aid wild species with suitable complex behavioral, social, nutritional, and psychological needs, a huge amount of expenditure is required.
By contrast, spending time and money on people are of great benefit regarding upgrading and expanding transportation infrastructure and finding out methods to tackle adversely infectious diseases. To begin with, due to the fact that transport ensures the everyday mobility of people and contributes to the production and distribution of goods, the transportation network is indispensable to the well-functioning of economic activities and a key to ensuring social well-being and cohesion of populations. Infectious illnesses, moreover, can be passed from individual to individual, even leading to hazardous pandemics, notably the Covid pandemic. Therefore, it is urgent to discover cures and vaccines for these diseases. Therefore, devoting time and budget to transportation systems and medical researches would be advantageous to people.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, my verdict is that humans should be prioritized over protecting wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Cycling is healthier and environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: T
t is appreciated that protecting wild ani...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72627737226 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32875727062 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8588724315 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280092604214 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854164005693 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581324339573 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162218469821 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740660339215 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.