The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries in 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart gives the information about the proportion of three sources of electricity generated in various countries namely India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam in 2003.
It is clear that while fossil fuel took significant parts in India and Vietnam, the opposite was true for Morocco and Sweden.
Regarding fossil fuels, 82% of electricity was generated in India, which was significantly higher than the figure in Vietnam, at 56%. By contrast, fossil fuel accounted for minor parts in Sweden and Morocco, at 4% and 5%, respectively. Turning to Hydropower, it was the most common source in most countries, except India. Specifically, it constituted from 44% in Vietnam to 52% in Sweden, and 95% in Morocco, which is also the highest figure shown on the chart. Concerning Nuclear power, although nearly 50% of electricity was produced by this source in Sweden, a very small percentage of it was recorded in India. Meanwhile, Morocco and Vietnam showed no use of this kind of power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-22 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-22 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Task 1 The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10429447853 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80720268543 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601226993865 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8708484541 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114610164662 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054145916068 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618850980151 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939965309003 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832753414158 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.