The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The upper picture represents the current structure of a small city named Islip and the below shows the future structural design of the same city.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there is a huge change in formation in the north side which is indicated as countryside, and the south side just after the school in comparison with the present architecture.
To begin with the road, at present there is a straight road which is passed through the center of the city, while in the future plan the road will turn into a circular shape and will be used as a dual carriageway. Then on both sides of the road, there are shops, moreover south side of the main road there is a residential area with a school and a park.
On the other hand, in the forthcoming diagram, most of the accommodation is on the inner part of the road. In this area on the northwest corner, there is a bus station, after that shopping mall, then a car parking area and a new residential place. In addition, from the center, there is a footpath with these shops are situated, furthermore, the school and park are in the same place, but the space of the park will be reduced.
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 82
- Some people say that teenagers should work part time and earn money This way they will learn basic lessons about work and become more disciplined Others argue that teenagers shouldn t sacrifice their rest and after school activities to work Discuss both v 73
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid sabbatical time believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Consider the possible arguments for 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 14
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46009389671 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48873235008 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4854661973 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0524530006377 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250166491697 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362717129564 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039609185438 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420269242532 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46009389671 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48873235008 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4854661973 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0524530006377 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250166491697 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362717129564 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039609185438 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420269242532 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.