The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the rate of people who entered into the workforce by sectors in the UK economy in a ten-year period from 2000 to 2010.
It is clear that the number of people worked in the private sector decreased in comparison with public sector experienced the fastest growth in the employment rate.
In 2000, the rate of people who worked at private sector started at 50. And then, there was a slight drop over the next two years, with 40 before experiencing remain stable until 2003. From that time, the figure went down significantly, finishing at 20 in 2010. In contract, the rate of workforce in public sector went in the opposite direction. Starting at under 40 in 2000, the rate rose minimally by around 2 in 2002. After that, it increased dramatically in the next two years, at under 50. At this point, the number continue to went up considerably until 2010, after having a slight decrease in 2006
Regarding self-employed sector, it rose modestly in the two following years with 20 before decreasing gradually and recover again until 2005, at 20. After that, the figure increased remarkably in the last five years, with 30.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A serious problems affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problems 56
- Learning to manage money is one of the key aspects of adult life How in your view can individuals best learn to manage their money 56
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79292929293 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59260188463 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6905538195 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178802324306 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786999282556 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800666283965 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139480262916 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856722398511 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79292929293 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59260188463 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6905538195 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178802324306 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786999282556 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800666283965 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139480262916 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856722398511 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.