The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The provided line graph makes a comparison in terms of waste production of three separate companies between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, it is evident that whereas companies A and B experienced a downward trend in the amount of waste output during this time frame, the opposite was true for company C.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 2000, company A released 12 tonnes of waste, whilst companies B and C produced around 8 and 4 tonnes respectively. In the following five years, the amount of waste produced by company A fell slightly by 2 tonnes. Both of the other companies, meanwhile, witnessed a two-tonne increase in their waste output.
From 2005 to 2015, company A reduced its waste production by approximately 3 tonnes, reaching somewhere in the vicinity of 8 tonnes at the end of the period. Company B, at the same time, showed a drastic decline in its waste output to 3 tonnes. The figure for company C, on the contrary, rose steadily to nearly 10 tonnes over a 10-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 78
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show current rates of secondary and higher education among people in various parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 10
- Writing task 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any r 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75287356322 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78460582388 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6838549593 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345218799558 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144677911442 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514008306208 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189350009538 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03142153616 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.