In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the development and breakthrough in the agricultural sector, people still suffer from starvation and manipulation. The following essay will point out some of the reasons and suggest possibles measurements.
First of all, even though the governments invest a lot of money to enhance agriculture, climate change contributes a part in making the quality products decrease and the number of food production per year deplete astronomically. With extreme weather conditions, many natural disasters such as prolonged floods that make food storage and famine occur more frequently. Therefore, although with the numerous of investments from governments to agriculture which would not able to work effectively. Secondly, people from the urban to the city, or immigrants would get low incomes but still need to pay high taxation as normal. Therefore, the most priority for themselves is how to save money. Consequently, lack of meals and meals with deficient calories can happen more frequently.
So what possible measurements can be useful. Firstly, governments should prepare early warning systems for extreme weather. Afterward, citizens can prepare a clear plan and strategies to avoid the upcoming events, this would against some of the bad consequences which can occur to some extent. Secondly, towards some regions that are influenced by climate change, hiring experts who can find out some useful solutions is not a bad concept. In addition, governments should create opportunities for immigration by reducing taxation or having subsidies for them. Financial problems would not be a matter of concern and they can spend more time taking care of their health more effectively.
In conclusion, various approaches could be implemented to help fight world hunger driven by climate change as well as the disadvantages of new immigrants.
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why Is this a positive or a negative trend 89
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there is more advantage to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment 78
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week What are the positive and negative effects on both individuals and society 56
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ion. The following essay will point out some of the reasons and suggest possibles measureme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t a lot of money to enhance agriculture, climate change contributes a part in mak...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the upcoming events, this would against some of the bad consequences which can occur to som...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54609929078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04254492551 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645390070922 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8765946212 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138490730237 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425503015225 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429054974761 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737449508522 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256073020966 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.