The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate a present airport and the plan for the redevelopment of it in the following year.
Overall, the airport is likely to experience considerable changes. Noticeably, more gates for different means of transportation might be constructed in the upcoming time and there is also the appearance of many facilities.
At present, there are only 8 gates for people to come into the airport while in the future, more 10 gates are predicted to be built. Meanwhile, there will be a construction of a sky train running in the middle of two sides of gates, which originally has a walkway. At the same time, some shops could be appeared at the entrance which is on the same side of the gate number one.
Whereas security passport control and passport control customs might still remain unchanged, there might be a construction of a car service nearby the arrivals. Additionally, the bag drop is projected to be built in the original land of check-in, which will be removed to the right side of departures. In the future, two newly-built coffee shops are constructed at the left corner of departures and at the upper right corner of arrivals. While ATM might be built right under the café in the arrival block, there will be the appearance of one more the arrival and the departure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v
- Some people think that outdoor activities bring beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 50
- The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82062780269 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84256124596 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9661317874 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0519946230775 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296826685796 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434583291895 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547789964178 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563542912121 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82062780269 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84256124596 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9661317874 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0519946230775 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296826685796 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434583291895 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547789964178 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563542912121 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.