The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table compares forested land in millions of hectares in six continents in the world during a period of 15 years.
It is clear that the area of forest in Europe was always the most in anytime between 1990 and 2005. It is also worth noticing that in general there were increases in forested land in Europe and Asia, there were however opposite trends in Africa, South America, North America, and Oceania.
According to the table, during the period Oceania was the continent having the least amount of green areas while the forest area in Europe came top of the list, having 197 and 1001 million hectares forest, respectively in 2005. Following Europe, in 1990 Africa and North America placed at second and third place, 749 million hectares for the former and 708 million hectares for the latter. While Asia only had only 576,000,000 hectares, less than 200,000,000 ha than Africa.
In 2005, both Asia and Europe experience a rise in forest area, rise by 10,000,00 ha on both continents. Regarding Oceania and North America, there was minimal decreases in both continents, by 2,000,000 ha. The forest area in South America and Africa fell dramatically, 70,000,000 and 60,000,000 ha respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | thomasneverseen | view | |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54344254899 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0965171015 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950478528562 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512991452646 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574623922178 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864659761908 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667431247541 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54344254899 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0965171015 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950478528562 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512991452646 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574623922178 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864659761908 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667431247541 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.