It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
A number of people hold the school of thought that the extinction of animals is natural selection and humans do not have to implement any measures to hinder this from occurring. However, from my perspective, this point of view is completely flawed and this paper will provide justifications to support my opinion.
It is no doubt that the extermination of animals is due to human influence. The majority of responsibility for this problem is humans’ as they have expanded their territory for cultivation and habitation which results in the less of animal habitat. For example, because of deforestation for cultivation, the living environment of the fauna has declined dramatically in recent years in agricultural countries such as Vietnam. Moreover, hunting animal species is also an activity that pushes the animal to be on the verge of extinction. In the past, hunting played a vital role in providing food for people, however; at present, hunting is not only for eating but also for other commercial purposes. Numerous species have been driven to mass extinction or become endangered owing to hunting such as pandas, polar bears.
Additionally, a wide range of animal species has an indispensable role in maintaining biodiversity. Only thanks to the existence of animals, is our ecosystem not disrupted since they play an essential role in the food chain. For instance, if all of the insects were lost, the species such as frogs would follow the bugs’ step because bugs are their predators. As a result, the demise of certain species of animals would trigger the natural course to be altered negatively; consequently; the human world will become more exacerbated on account of the dependence on animals.
All in all, animal conservation is a requisite activity which we must pay more attention to. Unless we do it successfully, we cannot strike the balance in our living habitat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the average rainfall for Australia by month for last year The line shows the average rainfall for Australia by month for the last 40 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 88
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not have to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources eg TV Internet do you agree or disagree 77
- Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lesson pressure on worlds fuel resources 82
- Many companies sponsor sport as a way for advertising themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages to this Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ole in the food chain. For instance, if all of the insects were lost, the species such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14935064935 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00961241831 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8474130469 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243945174504 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078746335362 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485712900509 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131970752097 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623134231127 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.