The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh this advantage?
With globalization accelerating at a rapid pace, there have been growing calls to have only one global government on the basis that it would motivate countries to pool resources together to resolve shared issues. However, I disagree with this notion since such advantages will be dwarfed by the disadvantages, the biggest of which is the potential abuse of power that could be exercised by influential nations.
The biggest advantage of forming such a government would be that it could encourage member countries to contribute collectively to solve common problems. A global government would be able to act faster in solving issues efficiently since they would have more resources at their disposal. For example, members of the European Union were asked to cooperate in tackling the Syrian refugee crisis of the last decade. Using their collective political and material resources, the European Union was able to house and integrate millions of refugees into its constituent members’ societies, providing much needed safety for a vulnerable population from their war-torn homelands.
However, a global government presents the risk of member nations abusing their power to serve their own interests rather than those of the entire world. For instance, in the United Nations, the closest approximation of a global government, nations can exercise their right to block or enact measures that can empower or enrich them or their closest allies, much to the detriment of the world as a whole. For example, two of the UN Security Council’s chief members Russia and China have been accused of exercising their veto power to block new security policies that will challenge their regional power, despite them being genuinely beneficial to the wider world.
In conclusion, the disadvantages of a global government, chief of which is possible rampant abuse of power, are far more substantial than its advantages. Moving forward, countries should retain their national governments, but continue to reach out globally to encourage mutual cooperation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 84
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy environment if people ate food produced from local farmers Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why Is it a positive development 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41065830721 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8713364603 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58934169279 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6831023074 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.909090909 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223369860107 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838138810616 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532137367448 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127363764935 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357646468015 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.