Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
Among various type of work/ profession, research work is being considered as a novel work because of its great extent of impact upon mankind. Since the early development of human to today's civilized world, there has been efforts and intellectual power of many scientists. The importance of scientific research work has been illustrated and learnt as a first lesson from the COVID 19 pandemic onwards. Scientific research work often requires a moderate amount, sometimes huge amount of money in order to conduct them in an efficient way and ultimately make them successful where Government or other organizations invest money to carry out the work perfectly. Despite the enormous effect, some scientists cannot make the proper use of money that were collected for many reason and they cannot clarify their idea and the consequences that would be made if their research project came out successfully. So, I strongly agree with the idea that the effects of the research work should be clarified before any Governmental funding is made for two reasons.
To begin, Governmental funding is used in various ways either its directly for the people of the nation e.g., fund for poor and old people, fund for sick and disabled person or it is used indirectly and for the long term such as making roads, schools and investing in research work. If a research project has no goal, or it's impact can not be understood and there is a very little effect that is not considered for any good, investing money for that reason will be a loss. Because, if the money is not invested for this type of work that amont could be utilized as a part of other welfare work.
Furthermore, many researcher consider funding from Government as an unlimited resource,so, they sometimes use this extravagantly without perceiving the consequences that will be gained from their research work. They often hire human workforce that are more than enough and there is a vast probability that the large manpower will create multiple opinions, thus resulting in a longer time on terminating any project with desired result. Moreover, non-efficient manpower could ruin the project totally. For instance, a recent reseach in my country was conducted by one professor who was assigned to solve a problem to enhance industrial production which was funded by Government. Nevertheless, without thinking either it will be applicable to the industrial sector or it will only reliable in small scale production, the professor took whole two years and the ultimate result was in vain respective to the case. So, before funding any project the Govenment should be careful to understand the method anf consequences with the help the experts. In addition, written research proposal with cent percent clarity should be claimed to make any commitment and grant project funding.
Of course, some argue that the consequences can't be realized initially for a different aspects of research work and any scientific work should be started with courage because no work will advance if it is not initiated. However, I think that research work is scientific and any scientific work should approach to meet a goal. As there is a point to be reached, there should be a valid and comprehensive way to reach the point, thus Governmental funding should be relied upon this factor, otherwise there is a chance of making a wasteful use of the money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | hemz26 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | SHADMIN | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | makiato | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 517, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mount of money in order to conduct them in an efficient way and ultimately make them successful whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 764, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...er use of money that were collected for many reason and they cannot clarify their idea and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun researcher seems to be countable; consider using: 'many researchers'.
Suggestion: many researchers
...t of other welfare work. Furthermore, many researcher consider funding from Government as an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...from Government as an unlimited resource,so, they sometimes use this extravagantly ...
^^^
Line 3, column 911, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ult was in vain respective to the case. So, before funding any project the Govenment shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ourse, some argue that the consequences cant be realized initially for a different a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'aspect'?
Suggestion: aspect
...t be realized initially for a different aspects of research work and any scientific wor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, i think, in addition, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2823.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 560.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04107142857 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78505257709 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0247821733 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.578947368 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4736842105 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168870120726 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639696352241 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444347003755 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121939992054 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119562613054 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.