Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary
In this modern world people will do any kind of work for higher salary. The large amount of income is more significant than the occupation gratification. I completely agree this statement by some points given below.
In the beginning, poverty is the main reason for people doing any kind of job with higher earnings. Nowadays, lot of people still in poverty life, also having some passion in career but they could not affordable it because of unavailability of money. They are deviated from their passion to seeking money. For instance, one of my friend had a dream was he become a wildlife photographer but it is not possible because he is from poor family. He could not afford it because his family depending him. He would go for another job for making money, he leave his dream for the money.
In addition, some people want to be rich and they want more luxury life style. Everyone having some kind of skills or passion in different fields but they are not willing to do that type work because they want more money. Some time it is not possible to make more in their own field by low wages, they find other solutions. To exemplify, there is a one neighbor of mine, who having good skills in the field of engineering but he does not interested on that kind of job. He believe it is not possible to make more money from that and he decide to doing business for his luxury life.
To recapitulate, in this day and age there is many people is being poverty and people will do any kind work getting higher income than the occupation gratification. All these points, I strongly agree this statement.
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 61
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows relative rates of language acquisition according to different study methods 69
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mily. He could not afford it because his family depending him. He would go for an...
^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leaves'.
Suggestion: leaves
...go for another job for making money, he leave his dream for the money. In addition...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...he field of engineering but he does not interested on that kind of job. He believe it is n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... not interested on that kind of job. He believe it is not possible to make more money f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'decides'.
Suggestion: decides
...ble to make more money from that and he decide to doing business for his luxury life. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59930313589 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48691167756 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494773519164 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9253893006 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968198151822 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03882672514 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283367835651 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722050145396 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256578285707 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.58950901804 76% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.