people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In current days, sharing many valuable informations such as scientific surveys, business and academic class benefits enormous number of people , yet one may argue that this crucial ones can not excavate freely. Personally, I belive that this development has two faces which are positive and negative aspects.
There are two possible reasons why I myself think people can be given many valuable realities. First of all, it is true that the number of people who are living in substandard conditions constitute hugely, and accessing to varied foundation knowledge is seemingly challenging, thus giving opportunities to read valuabe academic informations is the way to lend the assistance to their whole lifes. Moreover, scientifically speaking, due to the development of technology and science, the extent of pollution increases dramatically, thus allowing public people to access to scientific informations is the best way to acknowledge their substandard daily routines and switch to new ones. For example, if government add more signals and have strict laws to prevent people from littering, our current environment will be proactively conservated directly.
However, in some cases, the secret informations which contain many valuable and crucial details can not leak out easily because it can immediately destroy a company or a nation. Generally speaking, some huge and international companies always keep secret about their businesses’ strategies because if somebody knows about the recipe of sucess, they will directly copy without suffering any challenges. Moreover, the number of unconfirmed informations which have no reliable groups attest raises dramatically, so utilizing unknown sources can harm people from generations to generations because of wrong knowledge.
In conclusion, I myself reckon that utilizing paid information plays important role in our daily life, however sharing knowledge is the best way to lend assisstance to our society.
- Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular It is a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 67
- Th ng b o 1 H c sinh to n tr ng ngh h c trong s ng th 6 ng y 15 10 2021 GVCN l u th ng b o cho h c sinh
- As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 78
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ademic class benefits enormous number of people , yet one may argue that this cru...
^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lass benefits enormous number of people , yet one may argue that this crucial one...
^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons which have no reliable groups attest raises dramatically, so utilizing unknow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7133105802 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08011555815 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.880197287 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.4 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196200614492 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726070450712 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436881781835 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113770670635 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255135822845 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.