It would be argued by some that wildlife protection in zoos would play vital roles in entertainment as well as ecology. In my opinion, however, it is illogical to restrict animals’ movement by those zoos.
It would be argued by some that wildlife protection in zoos would play vital roles in entertainment as well as ecology. In my opinion, however, it is illogical to restrict animals’ movement by those zoos. This essay will discuss both views.
On one hand, there are some drawbacks to keeping them in zoos. First of all, wild animals kept in captivity for a long time would lose their instinct. They would forget hunting skills as well as abilities to protect their young since the zoo staff has been responsible for their livelihood. Besides, in many zoos around the world, wild animals also are abused by people who want to train them to make a profit. For example, when searching on the internet with keys like “abuse animals”, a range of photos that show out side-effects of zoos that become steady witnesses declares the crime of those people.
On the other hand, there are a lot of indisputable benefits that zoos can affect entertainment and ecology. First, in biological issue point, protecting endangered species in zoos plays a vital role in helping them to avoid extinction which causes by poaching. When accumulating them in places where have management of humans, it would save time and money for scientists to study animals’ behaviors. In that way, we could breed and keep varieties in safe places in case they disappear someday in the future. Secondly, having conservation areas would bring positive value to entertainment. For example, when people come to zoos, they not only see real wildlife in life but also are educated about protecting the natural environment.
In conclusion, keeping wildlife in zoos is necessary to avoid extinction that is always a complicated issue for natural diversity. However, humanity should implement protective plans appropriately and efficiently that bring the best benefits for the global environment.
- It would be argued by some that wildlife protection in zoos would play vital roles in entertainment as well as ecology In my opinion however it is illogical to restrict animals movement by those zoos 84
- It would be argued by some that wildlife protection in zoos would play vital roles in entertainment as well as ecology In my opinion however it is illogical to restrict animals movement by those zoos 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15181518152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80336568311 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600660066007 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9110801745 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404564059385 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12356220837 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153611686617 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284393373983 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.23165670218 0.056905535591 407% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.