The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table reveals the information about people that visit Ashdown Museum after and before his redesigning, with the survey of individuals who visit museum in past and after redesigning in same year.
Overall, the number of visitors had increased after upgrading the museum. However, people are not satisfied from museum condition, only a tiny proportion of visitors were happy, while after up gradation the museum, the level of satisfaction was dramatically converted into positive response.
The table shows that the number of visitors was 74000, and after redesigning the museum, the museum was seen significant growth in people and reached the number at 92000 visitors.However, only 15% people was very satisfied and 30% was only satisfied from museum condition. While, 40% was not satisfied and 10% are extremely dissatisfied. After the refurnish the number shown opposite trend with 40% people was satisfied. The uprise in very satisfied was 20%. Overall, 20% was not happy with museum. Only 5% visitors was not responded to survey.
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 59
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss Both views and give your opinion 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...nd reached the number at 92000 visitors.However, only 15% people was very satisfied and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ied and 10% are extremely dissatisfied. After the refurnish the number shown opposite...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d 10% are extremely dissatisfied. After the refurnish the number shown opposite trend with 40...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...te trend with 40% people was satisfied. The uprise in very satisfied was 20%. Overall, 20%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36585365854 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81276727199 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 84.4254364572 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3498892954 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154416229869 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663993899506 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245385226025 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350887821359 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.