Although nowadays people are reading news though internet, newspapers still remains of value.do you agree or disagree.
Although it was a long time ago, newspapers were a highly useful communication medium and provided us with a great deal of spiritual value. I'm not saying that it's no longer legitimate, but we must acknowledge that it's no longer practical and must give way to the next technological revolution. Here are some of my views on the subject.
For starters, reading newspapers is no longer practical. If you want to read a paper newspaper, you must go to a newspaper store since there are few businesses that will bring newspapers to your home, and even if it is a large city, there are few locations that will sell newspapers. You'll have to scramble to locate a place to sell newspapers and select one, and then you'll need additional space to keep it. It's not practical. Second, the material is not updated rapidly; the source must wait a few days for it to become available, and it cannot be changed instantly. You'll have to wait till that issue is released to read it. There is information that is out of date, which is a significant omission. Last but not least, there isn't much information; after all, what do you expect from a newspaper? It can't possibly include all of the news from all of the world since it is woefully insufficient. It's tough to keep track of all that information, and discovering old news is much more difficult.
To put it another way, you can obtain all of these things by reading newspapers online. It is constantly updated with the most up-to-date information and can search for old news from the past. Furthermore, in this day, everyone from urban to rural areas can connect to the internet, so you may read the news and search from anywhere without having to go to the newsstand.
I'm not suggesting that you disregard the sentimental significance of newspapers. However, relatively few people use it anymore, therefore it is no longer necessary. Look around at the newsstands; they're no longer packed, and purchasers are becoming scarce. It's a pity, but we must accept reality.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-21 | tuthilantuong | 56 | view |
2019-08-11 | Khshbhman | 84 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Although nowadays people are reading news though internet newspapers still remains of value do you agree or disagree 56
- What is the difference between traditional food and fast food 84
- The qualities that make someone admirable 56
- Write a narrative essay about an interesting place village city you have been to 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...en need more space to store that issue. its not convenient. Second, it doesnt updat...
^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t issue. its not convenient. Second, it doesnt update the information quickly, the sou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... few days for it to be available and it cant be updated immediately. If you want to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
... few days for it to be available and it cant be updated immediately. If you want to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ing to run to the newsstand anymore. Im not advocating that you forget the nost...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...tial. Look at the newsstands out there, its no longer crowded and has become rare f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, well, as to, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35812672176 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53767310244 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487603305785 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2546065037 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2631578947 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252954000574 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686812917647 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622399069189 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127721540678 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551200901798 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 12.4159519038 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.