Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
The foremost goal of teachers must be creating a good learn in the students. In these ways they can use varies methods which one of them is assigning project to the students. In my mindset, the most effictive way for student to have a best eduction is do the project indivisually. I think in this way they can done all of the duties by ownself and they are responsible in whole the project. I illustrate more about this reason in the following essay.
First off, I expriencely believe that in the group projects, all the students not cooprating in the all assignments. When teachers designate a project grouply, they expect that the students thinking together in the whole the project and done it, but opposingly the students first divide the project in small part and collocate between themself and the each of the group members does the partial of project individually. So on, the purpose of the teacher about group projects not be arrived. For example, I done all the group pjocets of my bachelor periods, alone.
Furthermore, I believe the lazy studends have most satisfaction in the class of grou project. If we accepted that the group project done in the teachers' expectable way, not all the student engage with the project fairly. The lazy ones have the least effort for the group project. Instead, the diligent and spesically the meticlous student work on the project constantly. Hence, the students have not get a balanced learning from a project. On the other hand, the indiviually projects engross whole classes and all of the students have same anxiety about projects.
Conclusionly, when a project is designated to done grouply, not only the students don't work on the whole of the project and they do a small part of them, but also some of the students are seem free from do anything. So, I believe that the indivual projects is more effective in order to learning.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 80
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 60
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... most effictive way for student to have a best eduction is do the project indivis...
^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... for student to have a best eduction is do the project indivisually. I think in th...
^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'do' or 'be done'?
Suggestion: do; be done
...ivisually. I think in this way they can done all of the duties by ownself and they a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ally. I think in this way they can done all of the duties by ownself and they are responsi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'did'?
Suggestion: did
...projects not be arrived. For example, I done all the group pjocets of my bachelor pe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...onstantly. Hence, the students have not get a balanced learning from a project. On ...
^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ally projects engross whole classes and all of the students have same anxiety about projec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to done grouply, not only the students dont work on the whole of the project and th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... they do a small part of them, but also some of the students are seem free from do anything...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...them, but also some of the students are seem free from do anything. So, I believe th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, for example, i think, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80923076923 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64932546958 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467692307692 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0959440507 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376782645408 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127727216553 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784185466592 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252869560874 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439627226356 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.