The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The diagrams illustrate information about a Grange park, How it developed in 1920 and the happened with the time period.
Overall the Grange park did not have change in the total area of park, just with relocating basic facilities and addition cafe, underground parking and children play area.
The picture shows that seats were around the Grange park, which relocated around the rose garden that is before at three different places near to seats. The fountain removed from the park by replacing rose garden. On the place of stage for artist was changed into open air theater for concerts. The entrance was at the same place with addition of underground car parking, which is right side of water feature, that build on glasshouse place. Pound for water plants was redesign for children play area. Leftside of play area had cafe, before their is rose garden.
To sum up this, the things like seats ans garden was combine at a place instead of a rose garden upside theater.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 61
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... Leftside of play area had cafe, before their is rose garden. To sum up this, the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'seats'' or 'seat's'?
Suggestion: seats'; seat's
...den. To sum up this, the things like seats ans garden was combine at a place inste...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87425149701 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26728760094 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.212188057 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154851032541 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654352320615 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622146216021 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100422033961 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647146830377 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.