In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land, therefore, they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, pollution environment is more and more serious. One of the most popular reasons is plastic bags, so I agree with the government's policy about the decreasing use the plastic bags in life.
There are many problems with using plastic bags in the world. The reason to ban this policy is that plastic bags are not original materials that cannot reuse. it wastes many years to recycle, leading to the environment's consequences. To obliterate these plastic bags, people have to burn them which cause make the air pollution. it is easy to recognize that water, solid and air are the main resource so this policy should be banned that will protect our health and our environment.
Furthermore, in many countries, shopping is gradually developed and using plastic bags in shopping is not the rare thing which increases at a high warning. If this policy is banned, the amount of using plastic bags will be improved. Instead of using plastic, paper bags which is available which can be easily disposed of without creating any atmospheric pollution will be encouraged in this shopping economy. For example, many big brands in the world such as Zara, H&M or Hermes are step and step to use paper bags as first flags to protect the environment.
To summarize, I believe that plastic shopping bags should be banned worldwide, due to the rate's rubbish in the coming years in the recent years. I would advise people to use paper bags for shopping and to avoid burning plastics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | Thao Nguyen B1608427 | 78 | view |
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Why are some people who leave school early more successful compared with those who complete their studies Provide reasons why they are more successful and what are the requirement for success 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ns is plastic bags, so I agree with the governments policy about the decreasing use the pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. The reason to ban this policy is that plastic bags are not original materials ...
^^
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...t original materials that cannot reuse. it wastes many years to recycle, leading t...
^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hem which cause make the air pollution. it is easy to recognize that water, solid ...
^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...protect our health and our environment. Furthermore, in many countries, shopping...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first flags to protect the environment. To summarize, I believe that plastic sho...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shopping and to avoid burning plastics.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90039840637 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56620717774 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525896414343 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4685104053 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238885503243 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929251449234 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447974613974 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153117089221 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279290194917 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.