It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is always argued that if a gifted talent exists even in a fetus. I do agree that people may own a born instinct in a particular domain.
Offenders often believe that teaching is an effective way for children to establish adept skills. In my opinion, practices sometimes work, but they tend to have little influence on a brain. In other words, external stimulation seems to be merely on the surface rather than a further crucial part of the memory. One can easily memorize things by muscles, however, when the circumstance transforms, they get puzzled. That is, we can be easily feated by challenges since we own no strong pulses. Regards to sportsmen and musicians, they were sorted by talents in their childhood, and classification lead to the distinguished roads for those excluded.
In my view, natural characters should be the main motivation for people to learn efficiently. For example, my talented fellow only touch the flute 2 years before and she had a fluent usage of the instrument as me, a nine-year learner. I'm confident that several years of diligent practising made me a professional player, but she easily broke the accord even without the burden of a systematic curriculum. It is an unconscious dynamic that improves her skills quicker than the contemporary. And the power of talent is always formed even when we are in our mother's uterus.
In conclusion, I admitted one can be taught well, but never achieve the height of those gifted in a certain classification.
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 50
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 100
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... instrument as me, a nine-year learner. Im confident that several years of diligen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92828685259 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91288193931 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7033203017 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172600001902 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514981999569 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374302878681 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949281109895 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180993834242 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.