Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some argue that it is necessary for them to be financially supported by governments, I would argue that artists should seek different sources of funding.
On one side of the argument, there are many who claim that money for art projects should come from governments. First of all, the government is responsible for promoting local cultural development. People speculate this might be due to the fact that some public artworks not only contribute to the creation of distinct characteristics but also represent the identity, culture, and history of the nation. For example, in Vietnam, there are several sculptures and historical sites in the city, which are refurbished every year. Another reason is that artists do not have particular resources and consequently, they need the financial support of the government in order to access prosperity and become popular among people. This means that if artists did not have anxiety and stress about making a living, they would be more inspired to concentrate on their work and design stupendous works of art.
However, I would be inclined to argue against this as I believe that alternative forms of funding should be used to support creative artists. The first reason is that earning financial support through donations or organising events are some alternatives to assist talented people in society. For instance, an entertaining company can organize a live concert, which attracts more than hundreds of audiences. As a result, these corporations appear to be better equipped to promote skilled artists’ images and present their exceptional works of art to the public. Secondly, the government has to allocate resources for other aspects of life such as health, education, and the environment. If authorities invested a large amount of money in artists while the country is living in poverty, they would be starved of money.
In conclusion, some people think that talented painters and musicians should be invested by the government, whereas others believe that investments in art coming from other resources would be better. In light of both perspectives, I have to admit that both commercial and non-government organizations should support better artists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- The prevention of health problems is more important than the development of new treatments the government should therefore invest more in prevention Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn history Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Threads The table compares the production of carbon dioxide in five countries in 2017 and 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medal winners in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 89
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33888888889 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91923696271 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1131129009 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339789390326 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101658374308 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762580522533 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228436732575 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627039247389 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.