In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In many nations, there has been a trend of shopping in big out-of-town stores, which is problematic for small town-center shops and leads to the escalation in car-usages, also people who do not possess these vehicles may find it challenging to access to those large shops. In my opinion, I believe that this phenomenon brings more pros than cons because of the reasons that are going to be mentioned in this essay
On the one hand, moving to stores that are outside the city can help alleviate the traffic congestion in the center as well as offer consumers more choices. When more shops are erected inside a city, they would attract more customers, consequently causing traffic jams and directly deteriorating the atmosphere. Meanwhile, the bigger shops sell more products, thus, this would not only benefit shoppers by giving them a wider range of options but also the whole economy by the revenue these stores make
On the other hand, it is obviously more inconvenient and immobile to travel in a long distance to only purchase a few items, especially for non-car-owners. In some circumstances, people are just looking for only a few things that they have just run out of when going to shops, which can be a big nuisance if they have to transport through hundreds of miles to reach the stores. In addition, it is almost impossible to get to the out-of-town stores without a vehicle, as a result, this can lead to a growth in cars sold as people who do not own a car have to face with more shortcomings when it comes to shopping
To conclude, although both positivity and negativity can be found in the preference of surburb shops. I strongly believe that its advantages can absolutely outshadow its drawbacks as it helps ease the traffic congestion in the city center and also develops the national economy
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- the table below shows the amount of waste production in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- The table data shows the proportion of iThe table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 ncome adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 73
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e bigger shops sell more products, thus, this would not only benefit shoppers by ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79872204473 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76612008909 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562300319489 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.2975951904 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7646285446 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 214.571428571 106.682146367 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.7142857143 20.7667163134 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.0 7.06120827912 269% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267382324119 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115974091674 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114529004658 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147827821784 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124737719314 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.0946893788 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.45 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 9.78957915832 281% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.1190380762 194% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.