The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries
from 1950 to 2000, with projections till 2050. Summarise the information by selecting
and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The column graph compares the changes in the proportion of population in India, China, the
USA and Japan in 1950 and 2000, and also indicates the projections for 2050. It is clear from
the graph that China had the highest percentage of world population in 1950 and 2000, but
estimates show that India will take the lead by 2050.
In 1950, China accounted for a little over a quarter of the world’s population. Although it
decreased to a little under a quarter, it was still the highest in 2000, compared to the other
three countries. It is estimated that the population of China will continue to drop and would
reach approximately19% by 2050.
India showed an opposing trend to China. The population in India in 1950 was 15%, which
was considerably lower than that of China. However, the population increased moderately
to 19% by 2000 and is further expected to grow and reach nearly 20%, which would be the
highest among the given countries by 2050.
When it comes to the population of the USA and Japan, both showed a decrease from 1950 to
2000. It is predicted that the percentage will remain the same in the USA, whereas in Japan,
the population is likely to keep falling till 2050.
Overall, Japan had the least population in the given period, and the population is expected
to decrease to approximately 3% by 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | mina_sharifi | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Ayushi Jain | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Ayushi Jain | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | gur1040894 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | gur1040894 | 78 | view |
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea 78
- Question Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meetin 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85775862069 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67332784702 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7606475162 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235068929572 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101811958647 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057947667708 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849618719093 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516610599251 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.