People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint?
Finding a job in today's society is no longer challenging because there are so many firms looking for skilled employees. As a result, the workforce is divided into two distinct groups. The first group desires to work in the same firm for the rest of their lives, whilst the second wishes to change employment regularly. It has advantages and downsides regardless of who is in the group.
To begin with, those in the first category who have been with the same company for a long period might be regarded as a typical model for advancement. They join the business, work hard, and get promoted. One advantage of working in this capacity is the stability that the company may bring. Employees can never be concerned about a sudden change in the workplace because their compensation and working position are gradually growing. Another advantage is that employees receive a retirement pension when they are no longer able to work as long as they remain loyal to their employer. However, there are several disadvantages to this type of working model. Working in only one career for an extended period may result in people gaining less experience since they only work in their areas of competence. One risk is that if they are no longer interested in this career, they will be unable to change employment since it is too late to start over.
In contrast to the first working paradigm, the second prefers to change jobs on a frequent basis. They do not stay in one company, but rather migrate from one to another in search of greater income or a faster advancement. The advantage of this type of job is that the employee may have a plethora of fantastic ideas and proposals as a result of their previous experience with the old company. These people's flexibility in the workplace is quite quick. They can quickly begin working in any capacity and get along with their colleagues. This functioning paradigm, on the other hand, has certain drawbacks. The person who decides to work in flexibility, such as this, must have money preparedness. Occasionally, employees leave a workplace but are unable to find other employment. In this scenario, they have little choice but to utilize their savings until they can find new employment. Furthermore, because these people typically move in and out, some employers may be concerned about their loyalty before employing them.
In conclusion, both working at the same company for the same job and transferring from one business to another to change employment have their own set of benefits and drawbacks. However, I am convinced that the individual who can find interest and motivation in his or her employment is choosing the proper career path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | huynhanhthuB1909001 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | huynhanhthuB1909001 | 61 | view |
- A narrative essay about an interesting place that you have been
- Admirable People
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement There is nothing that young people can teach older people Why Why not 60
- Admirable people
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9293598234 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70790122998 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490066225166 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1314294844 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0416666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213704009339 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603700157692 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692480365124 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14835641272 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326834402088 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.