For many people, the reason they work hard is to earn money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many argue that financial gains are the motivation for the workforce to work industriously. I am in total disagreement with this opinion as workers are influenced by changes in the job market and feminism instead of perks.
The emerging trend in the labor market has driven people of different ages to increase their productivity. In recent years, work efficiency rather than years of experience decides the shortlist of candidates for promotion in companies. As a result, with their fast adaptability to changes, young employees take on various responsibilities in projects to be considered for managerial roles. Facing the relentless competition from young colleagues, senior workers are left with no choice but to exploit their experience to the fullest and learn new skills in various assignments, or else they may be made redundant
Feminism is also attributed to the increased time and effort each sex spent on work. As the 21st century unfolds, women are given a wide range of job opportunities aside from being housewives. However, biases still exist, regarding females as the weaker sex and being inferior to males. Working industriously and having excellent performances at work is one of the ways for women to confront gender discrimination and solidìy their positions in society. Additionally, Male workers are also challenged by the appearance of female counterparts in fields that were once exclusive to men such as science, technology, business. As the belief of male dominance still persists these days, notably in orient society, many male employees feel the urge to work hard and become high-achievers, surpassing their female coworkers.
In conclusion, the reasons for increased loads of work vary according to age and gender. However, it is apparent that those motives are influenced by changes in the job market and job prospects for women rather than money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- For many people the reason they work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rather than years of experience decides the shortlist of candidates for promotion in companie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir positions in society. Additionally, Male workers are also challenged by the ...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry according to age and gender. However, it is apparent that those motives are in...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prospects for women rather than money.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35570469799 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04706856152 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6472644676 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160622994072 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056449943881 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500905151509 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983963599441 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238457612204 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.