Watch movie before reading the book
Nowadays, a major numbers of movies and series are based on books and novels. While some people prefer to watch the movie before reading the book, I would rather to read the book first then watch its film adaptation.
To begin with, books can fire the imagination engine of their readers. The reader can imagine the setting, the charachters, and their emotional expressions. Reading a book is a unique experience to live the lives of others and build new worlds in mind. In fact, the reader is the director of her personal interpretation of the book. Whatching the movie before reading the book, the person loses the opportunity of embracing such an experience. The scenes are visualized and the charachters are linked to actors or actresses. These pictures sticks to the audience's mind. As a result, when that person starts to read the book, unintentionally, uses the craved images to make connection with the book. Moreover, often some derivative workd fail to make the visualization properly. Take the example of Alic in Wonderland, a well-known book we all read in our teen ages, none of the cartoons and movies made based on it was successful.
To add, reading a book is a time-consuming activity. People should put time, efforr, and a clear mind to absorb the content of the book sentence by sentence to figure out what will happen at the end. No one read a novel in one take; sometimes, it might take several month to finish it. The movie, however, can be watched in less than a couple of hours. Once, the audience understand the whole story and its ending, she might be uninterested to bother herself to read the book. Four years ago, I borrowed a book from my friend:"the Girl on the Train." I was so busy and I could not find the time to read the book in three months. In a weekend, I accidentally saw the trailer of a movie based on the book with the same title on YouTube, and I watch it. So I understood its ending and returned the book without reading it.
To conclude, personally I do not prefer watching a film adaptation of a novel before reading the original book, it would hurt the experience of imagining the story. Moreover, it might make the audience lazy or disappointed to read the book.
- Palm oil 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It’s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 90
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 70
- Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships. 78
- TPO1-TASK1 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'several months'.
Suggestion: several months
...l in one take; sometimes, it might take several month to finish it. The movie, however, can b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in less than a couple of hours. Once, the audience understand the whole story ...
^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain.' I was so busy and I could not find the time to read the book in three ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, then, well, while, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68702290076 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78117863153 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52417302799 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4060565861 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7272727273 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8636363636 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560262776564 0.236089414692 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157683086754 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136863059649 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.405907880146 0.150856017488 269% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112363958501 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.