Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. some people think this money should not be invested this much.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some groups of people do believe that it is not eye-popping to insist on investing in having festivals to make money from. Even though there are many ways by which governments could earn money, having some annual festivals would be beneficial both for participants and government. I briefly agree with decreasing budget investments in festival celebrations since positive results could get brought. This essay will elaborate on two benefits being gained as investments in this process gets remained.
First, what festival celebrations will have an impact on is people's knowledge enhancement about different occasions. To be more precise, new generation might not be aware of most of events their ancestors used to celebrate. Accordingly, by having festivals being administered by governmental organizations, youngers would understand which events presumed to be important for previous generations. For instance, living within contemporary era many children may not have adequate information about Yalda in my country. In this case, what government is annually doing would be Yalda festival collaboration being held in a specific location which is available for any interested citizen who wants to acquire inquiries about Yolda night. To sum up, in today's world some occasions seem to be forgotten so festivals being held will be the key issue if people desire to participate in them.
Second, an easy money making approach for governments is festivals which many people are interested participating in. Clearly, other governmental investments do not seem to be outstanding to make money from as there are not proper infrastructures to rely on. According to this phenomena, heads of government do prefer to take this as an option because it is just a fruitful selection not to be afraid of encountering unseen problems. For instance, considering new good exports might not be fabulous decision when there is a festival on the table. Generally, budgets should be always taken into consideration as other administrations will be on the basis of so selecting accurate option like festivals seem more rational.
All in all, minority of people opine that it is not a great decision to approach money from holding festivals. Although it would be better to have such events for free, it is just a win-win action as it will be both enjoyable for citizens and beneficial to make money. I briefly think that government should not stop having such investments due to mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | Sarina9713 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this state Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 89
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the events') or simply say ''most events''.
Suggestion: most of the events; most events
...e, new generation might not be aware of most of events their ancestors used to celebrate. Acco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nfrastructures to rely on. According to this phenomena, heads of government do prefe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, first, if, may, second, so, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29695431472 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04865020659 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6154068552 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.944444444 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303029009759 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106460779833 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524801705892 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206900042983 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530254713827 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.