TPO 63- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, people are more willing to help people they don’t know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
It goes without saying that in the current progressive and sophisticated world where we live, the importance of helping each other is crystal clear. In this regard, while some people assert that nowadays people help strangers more than before, others believe otherwise and think that in the past people were more willing to help each other. In my view, I strongly support the first group for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, thanks to the enhancement of technologies, individuals are more aware of the distances between social classes in their society. To be more specific, the wide access to social media and updated news enables current generations to know about the poor people’s problems around themselves and try to help them solve their lives issues. My mother’s experience is a compelling example of this. She works in a charitable organization that provides financial and practical helps for homeless people. Their charity has an Instagram account and posts many videos and stories about the city’s poor people and encourages individuals to help them financially or in whatever they can. My mother says that it is a more effective way compared to the traditional methods which they used before and nowadays their charity can support more number of impoverished families. Had the charity not used novel technology to engage people in helping strangers, they could not have supported such numerous low-income families.
Furthermore, another equally remarkable point is that the general financial status of the modern generation has improved and ables them to help other low-income families. To give a more detailed view, nowadays, even ordinary citizens can dedicate absolute materials such as clothes and food supplies to their fellow human beings to improve others’ life quality. For instance, my father used to work as a farm laborer when he was just eight years old because his father’s income as a teacher was not sufficient for their family. Although my father is a math teacher like my grandfather now, we have a better life than they had before.
By taking into account all the above reasons, I believe that current generations are more likely to help strange low-income families. This is because not only do they have more knowledge about their society, but also people have higher incomes than last generations.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- ETS integrated essay 3
- task 1 3
- Nowadays a lot of students use technology like computers and smartphones for doing school work Some teachers believe that we should not limit students because it is an effective way of learning Others claim that we should limit students use of these devic 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, such as, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2015503876 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68665763587 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583979328165 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.438058939 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8125 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286805487879 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878762022491 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655637482189 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170733201497 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574996304953 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.