The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart provides information about the proportion of different languages which are used by around 529 million on the internet in December of 2001. Meanwhile, the table gives detail about how many people, on average, use the internet each year from 1997 to 2001.
Overall, there is little connection between the two charts. Western languages were prominent on the internet in 2001, where there was only one-tenth of the population have internet access. It is also noticeable that the number of internet users increased dramatically throughout the period.
In 2001, English was the most used language online, while Dutch was the least on the chart. In order words, almost half of the internet users (43%) preferred English, this figure was twentieth-fold Dutch which was 2.1%. Next to Dutch, only 5% higher, was the second-least used language on the table chart, Portuguese. Whilst ranked second and third, were Eastern languages, Japanese and Chinese, with 8.9% and 8.8% respectively, meanwhile, Korean users were about a half of these figures. German proportion was 6.8%, this number was 3% higher than Spanish and almost equal to Italian and French combined.
Regarding the table, in 1997, the number of citizens who had access to the internet was surprisingly low with just under 2% of the world population. However, in the next year, with 147 million users, this number was doubled. Between 1999 and 2001, there was a dramatic increase from 195 million people online to half a billion, that is to say, 8,4% of the world population.
- The bar chart shows the number of male and female people arrested by type of offence crime 79
- the diagram shows the process in which a tourist resort can develop and grow 86
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- the widespread use of the Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems connected with using the web what solutions can you suggest 78
- The graph shows the life expectancy of people living in Asian regions from 1950 predicts life expectancy until 2300 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1185770751 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58967192177 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1493823963 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6153846154 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172951112614 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066002308499 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386982646887 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108385810568 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311042118212 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.