In the past, most people used to travel to their place of work. With increased use of computers, the Internet and smartphones, more and more people are starting to work from home. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, it is true that the advancement of technological devices has enabled the community to work remotely, which feasibly triggers a gradual infrequency in people's physical commute. This application of professional arrangement can incite both benefits and drawbacks. In this essay, I am going to discuss both sides of the issue and give my opinion.
On the one hand, distance employment results in some inevitable detriments. Firstly, working from home might lead to employees' distractions. Without colleagues' and managers' supervision as well as observation most people claim that they do not suffer from psychological pressure during their business time. Secondly, working outside the office may degrade one's socialisation. It could be explained by the fact that a home-based environment possibly restricts social interactions including conversational or diplomatic establishment.
On the other hand, apart from those aforementioned downsides, there are some considerably positive aspects that are worth considering. Firstly, homeworking could help avoid excessive time consumption. For example, travelling to work would require people a significant amount of time; therefore, not having to spend time commuting each day would help with a reduction in time expenditure. Secondly, distance employment facilitates handicapped labourers' participation in the labour market. An explanation given for this is that miscellaneous occupational platforms condition an ample amount of opportunities for disabled workers who encounter mobility-related struggles to access their job market more easily.
To sum up, homeworking can generate both advantageous and disadvantageous dimensions; however, I personally believe that the benefits of this implementation dominate its drawbacks.
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten year pollution monitoring programme Traffic calming methods of slowing down traffic e g by building raised areas 73
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the Internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... working outside the office may degrade ones socialisation. It could be explained by...
^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'labourers'' or 'labourer's'?
Suggestion: labourers'; labourer's
...ance employment facilitates handicapped labourers participation in the labour market. An ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, as well as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.144 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49153032351 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8480687192 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211795486448 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555666782411 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469589987866 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10684581766 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363463343354 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.