The charts show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019
The line graphs give information about the total proportion of households possessing three distinctive electrical apparatuses and how many hours devoted to domestic works in on country over the period of 99 years
It is obvious that two out of three electrical devices witnessed upward trends during the given period, meanwhile, the figure for the washing machine experienced a moderate fluctuation. Apparently, it can be seen that the weekly hours people spending on housework sharply decreased over the period.
In the first year, while the refrigerator stood at 0%, the washing machine began at precisely 40%. In the next 40 years, however, there was an aggressive growth in the number of people owning the refrigerator, which even surpassed that of the vacuum cleaner and washing machine with more than 50% and 60% from 1940 to 1960. In 1960, the data for the washing machine was seen to follow a moderate decrease to slightly over 60% after a gradual growth in the first 20 years, but later rapidly recovered and reached a high record of more than 70% in 2019. Similarly, during the same period, the vacuum and refrigerator remained an equal increase before hovering and peaking at the top of 100% at the end of the year
By contrast, over the 40-year period from 1920 to 1960, there was a sharp decline from exactly 50% down to 20% in the number of weekly hours dedicated to household chores. In the subsequent years, those figures continued to steadily slide to just over 10% in 2000 before bottoming at exactly 10% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ore than 50% and 60% from 1940 to 1960. In 1960, the data for the washing machine ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90114068441 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58976954053 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.971501752 43.030603864 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.142857143 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5714285714 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563426679126 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242912349991 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256531439441 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042858446643 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252740843098 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.