Many people are copying celebrities from magazines and on TV. Why is this happening? Do you think it’s a good idea to copy celebrities?
Recently, the immense advancement of technologies has exposed viewers to counterfeit many top-notch artists from different means of media, such as well-known coverages or televisions. Personally, there are numerous causes undoubtedly lying at the bottom of the aforementioned phenomenon, and the forthcoming paragraphs will elaborate on my viewpoints.
Apparently, emulating celebrities cultivates a sense of satisfaction in one person, which means that viewers can seize their chances to experience a similar scenario as their favorite artists. Since there is a recognition deficiency to ordinary individuals, social platforms are the forums that people can effortlessly promote themselves, receiving compliments and positive interest from the community. The action of doing the impression of the artists also originates from the irresistible desire of changing lifestyle patterns. One artist is required to reinforce their well-being image that includes not only their countenances or interpersonal skills but also their healthy lives. This typically triggers the pursuit of the astounding, intriguing life in many people. For instance, many juveniles have proclaimed that the restricted, treacherous diets designated for Korean artists can do wonders as they gently stimulate the weight loss journey to function rapidly, resulting in an awe-inspiring manifestation.
I firmly believe this counterfeit action can excel for viewers. Scientists have pronounced that there is a transparent correlation between well-known people and ordinary people, called the parasocial relationship. This term ideally allows admirers to perceive their ultimate artists as comrades to be incentivized in a bid to boost productivity and the amelioration in working. Nevertheless, viewers should take this action into consideration before adopting it as pernicious effects can plausibly occur.
In brief, there are hidden, arcane facts of high-profile celebrities that we might not be exposed to. Therefore, making the impression of an artist is beneficial only if viewers adapt it appropriately.
- Some people think that it is good to be ambitious How important is it to be ambitious Do you think it is a good characteristic 84
- Many people are copying celebrities from magazines and on TV Why is this happening Do you think it s a good idea to copy celebrities 89
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02693602694 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33229586276 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6741036625 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11685550654 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384062095209 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249705232186 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626844517275 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245518246243 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.