In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker assert that progress makes demand on discussion among people who have contrasting opinion in any situations, such discussion can be conductive to the progress. While it is too extreme to claim that it can be hold for any situation.
In growing world, government more focus on research area because of its benefits in accordance of human being. They spent millions and billions dollars on several research requires several years to giving an output. It very much beneficial for one country to take discussion with developed country. Taking their suggestion, so that they can rephrase their idea and also some possibility of effectiveness in reducing cost. It's kind of making good relation with country also starting of new research program.
In considering medical industry, one of such area related to human health. Considering medicine development stage where company full of its effort for introducing new medicine which cure human disease as early as possible. There is major role of critics who have opposing view, which really saving millions of dollars by providing of production of that medicine.
In opposite view, even though taking contrasting point of view may hindrance for success. The best example ever in politics, because of their own profit government some time doing delay in taking discussion. In staring of public health care, two political opposes their view, they show of their powers. In actual from such contrasting view, public may hamper from getting heath care system with free of cost.
To sum up with all, it's hold importance of contrasting point of discussion but it's not all together possible in each and every field.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past two years the Mantle Magnesium Miners MMM has purchased over 20 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of East Genovia Mining magnesium on this la 66
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects Clearly opening the caf w 60
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 62
- The following appeared on the Picasso School of Art website The Picasso School of Art should be the premier choice for parents considering enrolling their child for art lessons First of all the Picasso School welcomes youngsters of age there is no portfol 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
The speaker assert that progress makes demand on discussio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some research'.
Suggestion: some research
... spent millions and billions dollars on several research requires several years to giving an out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th country also starting of new research program. In considering medical indus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, really, so, while, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 269.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21933085502 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65355649265 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8492768707 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217977945959 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671558310431 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662701711474 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115688782006 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049022664077 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.